FBI raids are certain to grab headlines. 

That can raise an ethical question, though, if the possibility exists that the purpose of the raid is for its intimidating effect as much as it is to grab wrongdoers. 

Could this be the case in raids involving two e-currency companies?

The e-money examinations are an outcome, to some degree, of one government's uncertainty concerning how to manage e-monetary forms inside their boundaries when those monetary forms are neither fiat nor essentially domiciled inside those lines.

This helps me to remember broadcasting's initial days when the Feds were astounded about how to best adapt to radio transmissions that main submitted to the laws of material science and subsequently were able to cross state lines without legislative consent. 

As crazy as that sounds today, the prospect of a specific innovation being further developed than political as well as topographical depictions was of profound worry to them. 

It eventually required almost 15 years for the American government to make the Federal Communications Commission adapt to such a 'progressed' business as highway broadcasting.

standards given the way that e-monetary standards are secretly created and managed, and considering that no focal checking framework exists to support their guideline, it is nothing unexpected under this climate of American regulations to now see a clamor of tyrant consideration coordinated toward them. 

Everything they can manage is to accept a pretentious situation in light of a legitimate concern for 'purchaser security' and cast slanders through justification. It's not especially fair, however as we've seen in related web-based gatherings, it's very successful.

Ideally, the issue will be gotten comfortable significantly more quickly than it was in communicating.